University life comes with heavy demands as students juggle academics, work and volunteer roles out of necessity rather than choice. We, the students, often find ourselves reading for long hours, whether it is textbooks, journal articles or lecture slides.
For many of us, the act of reading is not just about processing words on a page, but about grappling with ideas, memorizing facts and preparing for exams. By the end of the day, our eyes are strained and our attention spans are depleted. As a result, for someone like me who also loves literature, there is little time left for personal reading with all the additional chores at hand. In that context, audiobooks offer an alternative — not a substitute of lesser value, but another valid way of engaging with knowledge.
The idea that only printed reading counts as “real” learning is rooted in long-standing assumptions about literacy. But listening to books is not new. Oral traditions were once the main way knowledge was passed on. Stories, histories and lessons were shared by voice long before widespread literacy.
Audiobooks are not a replacement for reading but a continuation of this tradition, adapted for digital life. For me, this means a chance to learn and explore ideas through listening rather than solely relying on text.
One of the clearest advantages of audiobooks is accessibility. For someone who is juggling multiple responsibilities at a time, sitting down with a book can begin to feel like an unattainable luxury rather than a closely kept habit. Audiobooks help keep reading present by turning otherwise idle moments into opportunities for engagement. A commute, a walk across campus or time spent cooking can become a moment to continue a short story, novel or a work of philosophy.
Audiobooks also reduce the physical strain that comes with constant screen time. During exam periods, especially, students spend long hours reading from laptops and textbooks. Listening offers a way to stay connected to literature without further exhausting tired eyes. Rather than replacing reading, audiobooks provide a complementary way to engage with ideas when traditional reading feels overwhelming.
Critics often argue that listening is less effective for comprehension. While reading does encourage close analysis, listening is not inherently inferior. Research suggests that people retain information at similar levels whether they read or listen. For many, hearing a text enhances memory through tone, pacing and emphasis. Narration can make arguments clearer and stories more vivid, which helps listeners connect emotionally and intellectually to the material.
The performance aspect of audiobooks can also deepen engagement. Skilled narrators bring characters and rhythm to life in ways that enrich the experience. Shakespeare, for example, often becomes clearer when heard aloud. Memoirs read by their authors add a sense of intimacy that strengthens connection to the text. For students exploring literature outside the classroom, this can reignite curiosity and enjoyment.
However, audiobooks do have limitations as well. They are less suited for close citation or detailed academic analysis, where flipping between passages is essential. But this does not diminish their value. Instead, it highlights that different formats serve different purposes. Print supports deep study, while audiobooks support flexibility and sustained engagement with reading as a habit.
For me and many others like me, the real benefit lies in choice. Audiobooks make it possible to continue reading for pleasure even when schedules are full. In a university environment where burnout is common, that flexibility can be the difference between abandoning personal reading altogether and keeping it alive.
Ultimately, to me, audiobooks are not shortcuts. They are another way of experiencing literature — one that helps students maintain their relationship with reading amid the demands of university life.
