A part of KISStory

Article Tools

Manitoban writer steps into boots of rock god

I’m standing in Onalee Ames Studio where the majority of the rehearsals have occurred for Lester Gets KISSed (LGK), a Winnipeg Fringe Festival Production for which I am the stage manager and a cast member.

“You’ve done makeup on yourself before right?” asks a fellow cast member. “Not really,” I reply.

This isn’t ordinary lipstick and eyeliner we’re talking about. In this production I’m portraying 1970s-era Gene Simmons of the mega-sized rock group KISS, which entails donning full greasepaint makeup, eight-inch platform heels, body armour, and tights.

My journey with this started when I came across an ad for auditions that stated “If you happen to look like Gene Simmons or Jesus ... all the better.” I couldn’t resist, but not because of any resemblance I have to rock god Simmons, but because I happened to be sporting long hair and a sizable beard: my “Jesus” look.

The first audition for the role of Jesus went well enough to earn me a call-back. While at the call-back the directors had me stand in on other people’s auditions and had me read as Simmons as well as another rock relic from KISS, Paul Stanley.

Again, things went well enough for them to keep calling me back but not two minutes after I received an e-mail asking me to return to as Jesus again, I was asked to read only for the role of Simmons. Apparently the impression I created from watching youtube.com videos of Simmons paid off.

Writer/directors Kevin Doherty and Alan MacKenzie, did something different and cast two people to play Simmons; myself and a high school teacher who happens to be a KISS Army fanatic named Russell Antymis. Not that he had to prove his fanaticism, but Russell showed up to his first audition in the full costume and makeup that we are now sharing for the actual production.

LGK is a comparatively large production, especially for the Fringe. There are a total of 14 performers in the cast, many of whom have other commitments, be it film work, dancing or even other Fringe productions. This means that I often had to stand in for actors who were missing.

To complicate things further, early in the rehearsal process I was offered the position of stage manager, which meant that I’d be responsible for all of the sound and lighting cues, plus all of the scene transitions during the performances. Basically, once the directors were done with us during rehearsals, I’d run the actual show.

This wouldn’t be a Fringe show if it did not face some troubles. A rotation of performers went through the Paul Stanley role before we found an actor without commitments out of town. I found it amusing that in a city which has a cover group called ‘the Paul Stanleys,’ for a while we couldn’t land a single one. The role of Jesus didn’t fare much better. The role seemed cursed as Ryan McDonald (the actor portraying Jesus) battled a sprained ankle and mono throughout rehearsal process. Thankfully, he took it all in stride and never had to leave any of the two Fringe shows he was in.

I have done productions I was less than proud of but I can honestly say this is one of the best experiences I’ve had in the Fringe thus far. The show is loaded with very talented and funny people and the musical numbers are straight out of the KISS library (spectacle attributes included).

Lester Gets KISSed is the story of a bible shop worker who rekindles a suppressed love for rock ‘n’ roll when KISS reunites for one night only in his hometown. LGK is showing at the MTC Warehouse until July 27. Tickets are $9 or $5 if you show up in full KISS makeup.

Your rating: None

Comments

narcissism mistaken for journalism

My main objection to this piece is that you're basically using your place at the Toban to gather interest for something you're involved with. In my view this is kind of unethical. You'll never catch me promoting my projects myself in my section. As a reporter you should seek out other peoples stories and not just go on about your own life. I know some people may disagree with me, but it's kind of like running in an election on a platform that will get your stocks to rise. It's a conflict of interest and if allowed to continue could turn the Manitoban into a narcissistic rag like so many blogs on the Internet.

Sorry, I mean I think you're a good guy from our brief experiences together but I also think if you want to advertise in the toban, you should pay to put your advertisement there.

Hi Corey, I actually asked

Hi Corey, I actually asked Will to write this article because I was curious as to what a person doing a Fringe play has to do. But, to each their own.

I see

Well then the statement about William writing this peice out of narcassism would be incorrect, though the overall point of speaking about ones own projects in their own peice I do still find suspect. Since posting this comment I've noticed such things occuring in several other instances, so it's also unfair to target William specifically. I just don't see how such things can be considered completely ethical. He was at least forth right about his attachment to the project which is good as I've noticed other situations where only due to my knowledge of the person am I aware of the conflict of interest. Here would be an example where one could get caught in such a case. Say my freind made a film and I write for the paper. Due to our freindship it's likely best if I don't review the peice for either our freindship will bias my view or my review will sour the freindship. I personally would never be inclided to review a peice in this situation. The same is true for if I was set to review a freinds returant. While it's better to be open about the conflict of intrest within the article it's still better (in my view which is merely a view) to not mention it at all.

retraction

Thanks for the retraction of your comment against me.
I have only discovered this discussion now. Not that much more needs to be added I shall say a small few things.
My "position" was that of a volunteer. I was not paid staff while composing this piece as there are no reporters on staff during the summer. I know you've already taken back what you've said about my specific article but I just want to secure the knowledge that my interests where solely in what I was asked to do when I offered to do anything on my own time.
I only wish more dirt occured during this show so that I could defend my intimate view of the production but alas, it went rather well. I'm sure any reporter could have interviewed me to get similar information...but then again, that would create another sort of conflict knowing my history at this magazine.
That's enough I suppose.

© 2009 the Manitoban | View our privacy policy